About AVT
Browse Articles
Authors
Customer Services

Original article

Nevirapine versus atazanavir/ritonavir, each combined with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine, in antiretroviral-naive HIV-1 patients: the ARTEN Trial

Vicente Soriano, Keikawus Arastéh, Horacio Migrone, Thomas Lutz, Milos Opravil, Jaime Andrade-Villanueva, Francisco Antunes, Giovanni Di Perri, Daniel Podzamczer, Steve Taylor, Pere Domingo, Holger Gellermann, Lothar de Rossi, ARTEN investigators, ARTEN investigators

Corresponding author name: Vicente Soriano
Corresponding author e-mail: vsoriano@dragonet.es

Citation: Antiviral Therapy 2011; 16:339-348
doi: 10.3851/IMP1745

Date accepted: 18 August 2010
Date published online: 04 March 2011

Abstract

Background: Selection of first-line antiretroviral therapy requires consideration of efficacy as well as effects on lipids given the increased concern about cardiovascular risk in HIV-1 patients.

Methods: ARTEN is a randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial that compares nevirapine (NVP) 200 mg twice daily or 400 mg once daily to atazanavir/ritonavir (ATZ/r) 300 mg/100 mg once daily, each combined with fixed-dose tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) 300 mg/emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg once daily, in antiretroviral-naive HIV-1 patients with CD4+ T-cell counts <400 (men) and <250 cells/mm3 (women). The primary end point was plasma HIV RNA<50 copies/ml at two consecutive visits prior to week 48.

Results: A total of 569 patients were randomized and treated. Overall, 66.8% of NVP and 65.3% of ATZ/r patients achieved the primary end point (difference 1.9%, 95% CI -5.9–9.8%). Similar rates of serious adverse events were observed (9.6% on NVP versus 8.8% on ATZ/r), although discontinuations due to adverse events were more frequent with NVP than ATZ/r (13.6% versus 3.6%, respectively). None of the 28 patients virologically failing ATZ/r selected resistance mutations, while they were selected in 29/44 patients virologically failing NVP. NVP induced a significantly greater increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) and apolipoprotein A1 from baseline than ATZ/r, whereas triglycerides increased significantly more with ATZ/r than NVP. Mean change from baseline in TC:HDL-c ratio was -0.24 for NVP and 0.13 for ATZ/r (P=0.0001).

Conclusions: NVP demonstrated at week 48 non-inferior antiviral efficacy compared with ATZ/r when given along with TDF/FTC, despite more drug-related discontinuations with NVP than ATZ/r. NVP was associated with a lower atherogenic lipid profile than ATZ/r although resistance mutations were more frequently selected with NVP than ATZ/r.

<< BACK

Copyright © Nucleus Global 2014. Part of Nucleus Global.
Design and Technology by Nucleus Global
Company registration No. 321 0712 (England & Wales). Registered Office address: Admiral House 76-78 Old Street, London EC1V 9AZ.